The Letby
@TheLetbiesAn account to highlight superfans for a convicted serial baby killer.
Maybe people will realise that we were telling the truth and Damian lied.
The issue here is they are showing how to intubate a baby and check chest movement before the tube is secured. That is different to a tube moving when you are trying to secure it. Additionally bag and mask are not used as pressures can’t be guaranteed
That says 4.7, not 1.7. Have those defending Letby now gone down the road of outright gaslighting?
The notion that one cannot be convicted on circumstantial evidence is, of course, false. Most criminal convictions are based on circumstantial evidence, although it must be adequate to meet established standards of proof.
Perhaps @sarahknapton would like to comment or write an article on her source, Sarrita Adams, who has been exposed as a fraud. Her relentless pro-Letby articles have done much to fuel the false narrative, which is based on the fraud's 'work'. The emails are from June 2023 whilst…
I'd call that a pretty strong endorsement.
However, I'm sure you agree in the primary purpose of convicting for a crime. It's called justice. BTW, please explain how this mechanism you speak of works, where further convictions prevent public debate. I'm genuinely interested in how you came up with this idea.
A great read from @judithmoritz Hopefully some much needed balance will be brought to the #LucyLetby debate when Panorama airs tomorrow. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
Paging: @ClarkeMicah These are the people you support. Frauds.
@drphilhammond, here is something you need to be aware of with your favourite Letby fraud, Sarrita Adams, the source @rachelaviv used for her New Yorker article. The screenshot is a picture of a fake PhD she presented to a court in California recently, when she tried to gag…
Latest legal position from the Letbyists. If an expert who is spouting off in a newspaper that Letby is innocent has been too lazy to actually read anything to do with her trials. This proves the convictions are unsafe. I don't know how this works, but the Letbyists believe it
It was not protocol to touch the designated nurse's baby without permission, even for the consultants. Yet Letby had her hands on all of the babies in the indictment,despite not being designated nurse for many. It is clear that there were double standards employed for Letby. The…
Letby's shift leader wrote a Datix report because Letby kept leaving her designated baby, who the shift leader was worried about, to go to Baby C situated in another room. Baby C fatally collapsed with Letby cotside, 15 minutes after being aspirated,and had a volume of air large…
Baby C was aspirated at 11pm, after which there was no air in his stomach, he had a fatal collapse 15 minutes later at 11.15pm and there was so much air in his stomach that it killed him. His designated nurse had left the room and Letby was cotside despite not having any babies…
@sarahknapton of the @Telegraph wrote an article which disingenuously included data for babies of 24 weeks gestation and under, despite COCH only admitting babies 27 weeks and over. Here Eirian Powell confirms that they didn't admit such premature babies. Perhaps Ms Knapton would…
The RCPCH report stated higher acuity but that does not equate to admissions of less than 27 weeks. @peterelston1 and @sarahknapton are twisting the report to make their false claims. #lucyletby
You do understand what the inquiry is for don’t you Peter? Because in fact you appear not to. It isn’t to establish guilt or innocence in respect of Letby. That was for the court to decide, which it has. The inquiry is to see what lessons can be learned, and there will be many.
@drphilhammond, here is something you need to be aware of with your favourite Letby fraud, Sarrita Adams, the source @rachelaviv used for her New Yorker article. The screenshot is a picture of a fake PhD she presented to a court in California recently, when she tried to gag…
It seems that the woman behind the Science on Trial account and one of the sources for the New Yorker article about Lucy Letby may not be very trustworthy. Who knew? reason.com/volokh/2024/10…
The devil is in the detail… something Sarrita knows nothing about, which is likely why she failed her PhD. She’s not that competent legally, and fraud isn’t her strong point either 😮💨 #LucyLetby
@drphilhammond, here is something you need to be aware of with your favourite Letby fraud, Sarrita Adams, the source @rachelaviv used for her New Yorker article. The screenshot is a picture of a fake PhD she presented to a court in California recently, when she tried to gag…
Hypocrisy is not pretty, Mr Hitchens. I echoed your post about #lucyletby being wrongfully imprisoned. You think it's OK to feel emotional about a serial baby killer and her family but not about murdered and injured babies and their families. I see.
United States Trends
- 1. Warriors 69,6 B posts
- 2. Rockets 43,8 B posts
- 3. Steve Kerr 6.341 posts
- 4. Draymond 8.423 posts
- 5. Selena 108 B posts
- 6. Diligence 4.591 posts
- 7. Steph 27 B posts
- 8. Voice of America 28,1 B posts
- 9. Podz 5.494 posts
- 10. #playstationwrapup N/A
- 11. #Survivor47 12,8 B posts
- 12. Benny Blanco 17,5 B posts
- 13. Knicks 35,7 B posts
- 14. Sengun 6.096 posts
- 15. Whataburger 1.307 posts
- 16. #AEWDynamite 27,4 B posts
- 17. Jalen Green 4.514 posts
- 18. Hawks 32 B posts
- 19. Kari Lake 31,9 B posts
- 20. Bill Kennedy 1.197 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.