@mrjgossipgirl Profile picture

mrjusticegossipgirl

@mrjgossipgirl

Free Speech Champion 2024 r/scienceontrial

Joined October 2023
Pinned

[Eugene Volokh] Court Order Requiring Removal of Reddit Criticism of Scientist/Consultant Vacated ift.tt/bQlEDaI



A good read for those advocating loudly for #lucyletby's exoneration. But you know, do what you're gonna do.

Sean, I went into Avenging Angel mode shortly after the verdict because I was appalled by some of the statistical evidence which was reported in the press. I was fully prepared to make a fuss and to that end I began gathering information on the full trial through sources. When I…



mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

It's the supreme irony of this absurd kerfuffle. The Letby Troofers think their imaginary 'court of public opinion' should be allowed to overrule real courts, and yet they simultaneously assert this demand for mob justice by denouncing the actual trial as a witch hunt. 🙃


mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

Vice versa, I'm afraid🥹 I have decided in fact to desist from further participation upon this subject because it has become no more than an ego driven personality cult , centred not upon Lucy Letby , but rather upon the vanity of her press spokesman. The bombastic presentation…


mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

@ClarkeMicah, while you haven’t explicitly declared Letby innocent, your stance has undeniably fueled a wave of supporters proclaiming innocence. This distortion of your critique, whether intended or not, has become a rallying cry that undermines accountability and justice.


mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

lEtbY MiGhT bE InNoceNt. That’s it.

I think what he has rhymes with duck maul



Lucy Letby supporters insisting there is no evidence to convict her #lucyletby

mrjgossipgirl's tweet image. Lucy Letby supporters insisting there is no evidence to convict her
#lucyletby

mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

The question is how did 2 neonatologists, unrelated to #LucyLetby 's case, get hold of Baby O's [medical] notes to write an alleged report that @drphilhammond has allegedly seen? Is Letby's new barrister, @legalmarkmc, sharing confidential records, which are protected by Data…

I believe that Dewi Evans concluded murder in less than 10 minutes after starting to review the Baby O case notes.



mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted
lizhull's tweet image.

mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

Straw man. It's not "all-get-out cunning" for a defence team not to take actions that they believe will further harm a defendant's case - it's their job. And there's one possible reason Letby is now in a small locked room that you seem increasingly unable to contemplate.


mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

I’m not a cult member unless it’s the cult of justice. Letby is guilty.


mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

Imagine using your hard earned cash to actually pay for this legally illiterate and factually incontinent drivel

's tweet image. Imagine using your hard earned cash to actually pay for this legally illiterate and factually incontinent drivel

mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

Imagine Peter Hitchens not being able to engage in discussion about the Letby case for many months.

cjsnowdon's tweet image. Imagine Peter Hitchens not being able to engage in discussion about the Letby case for many months.

This sort of thing greatly increases the likelihood that Ms Letby will now be charged with more hypothetical offences, so making discussion of the case in the media impossible for many months. If this *does* happpen, one has to ask what the purpose of such charges would be.



I had to google if this was true but it is AND I LOVE IT

BREAKING: THE ONION backed by some of the Sandy Hook families and in a special deal with Everytown for Gun Safety has acquired INFOWARS story coming



mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

This. And considering this is somebody’s child, their murdered baby, I honestly do not know how she sleeps at night. @Telegraph shameful.


Turns out that you can't make a square Letby-shaped peg fit a round innocent-shaped hole when you look at the whole picture.

Her evidence comes after another reviewer called Sue Eardley told the inquiry Ian Harvey used her to try to prove the consultants were wrong about Lucy Letby. Our special episode will be out tmrw from Liverpool Town Hall.



mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

No Peter. Hypotheses are like pregnancy. It’s not possible to be a little bit hypothetical. And no Peter, the hypothesis that Letby was a murderer presented to the jury in the Crown’s theory was not guesswork. But yes Peter, you’re doing sophistry.

GuffyNicola's tweet image. No Peter. Hypotheses are like pregnancy. It’s not possible to be a little bit hypothetical. 

And no Peter, the hypothesis that Letby was a murderer presented to the jury in the Crown’s theory was not guesswork. 

But yes Peter, you’re doing sophistry.
GuffyNicola's tweet image. No Peter. Hypotheses are like pregnancy. It’s not possible to be a little bit hypothetical. 

And no Peter, the hypothesis that Letby was a murderer presented to the jury in the Crown’s theory was not guesswork. 

But yes Peter, you’re doing sophistry.
GuffyNicola's tweet image. No Peter. Hypotheses are like pregnancy. It’s not possible to be a little bit hypothetical. 

And no Peter, the hypothesis that Letby was a murderer presented to the jury in the Crown’s theory was not guesswork. 

But yes Peter, you’re doing sophistry.

mrjusticegossipgirl Reposted

It’s literally called a trial because a theory (i.e. a hypothesis) is being put to the test. Peter Hitchens knows this and is being willfully thick.


United States Trends
Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.