@j_erhardt Profile picture

Jonathan Erhardt

@j_erhardt

🤓 philosophy stuff: https://t.co/rlNih1eHzh ⚙️ founder @twinearthgames ⚙️ co-founder @ https://t.co/2J6exxrNfv https://t.co/AViQ4MrgnV

Joined November 2014
Similar User
David Thorstad photo

@DavidThorstad

Andrew Y. Lee photo

@andrewyuanlee

Jonathan Birch photo

@birchlse

Kevin Dorst photo

@kevin_dorst

Karina Vold photo

@karinavold

Toby Thomas Friend photo

@tobytfriend

Mark Coeckelbergh photo

@MCoeckelbergh

Joel David Hamkins photo

@JDHamkins

Helen De Cruz photo

@Helenreflects

Hayden Wilkinson photo

@HaydenWilko

What Is It Like to Be a Philosopher? photo

@CliffordSosis

Brandon Warmke photo

@BrandonWarmke

Ethan Landes photo

@EthanELandes

SpringerEthics photo

@SpringerEthics

Paul Austin Murphy photo

@PaulAustinMurp2

Pinned

Philosophers have long tried to provide analyses of the content of various concepts, with limited success. This has arguably boosted views that reject linguistic clarification as a mail goal in philosophy. I think philosophers will soon have a new tool for conceptual analysis 1/n

Tweet Image 1

Jonathan Erhardt Reposted

Switzerland does a great job of discouraging couples from having kids and being productive. Instead, it heavily encourages single-earner households. That imbalance is likely to be bad for the kids as well as for the economy. What if we became a country of builders instead?


Jonathan Erhardt Reposted

It is physically impossible for any law to make seven million homes "affordable" to nine million households who want to live in them. Two million bidders *must* be priced out. Only building new homes within a region can make more families find homes "affordable".


My Shelley x Beksiński x Warhammer40k crossover "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2
Tweet Image 3
Tweet Image 4

GPT-4o passes the riding mermaid test, devised by our 4yo.

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2

GPT4o still can't infer the correct rules from the image. Interestingly, the analysis step is correct. It just can't get the right verbal representation out of the image.

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2

Jonathan Erhardt Reposted

i vividly remember my excitement when i came across the 1990 issue of PP on philosophy of mind (jstor.org/stable/i312552), with now-classic articles by block, churchland, harman, haugeland, loar, ramsey, and many others. may the 2023 issue play the same role for a new generation!


Jonathan Erhardt Reposted

Philosophers keep claiming that the ordinary, intuitive view is that there are objective facts about this or that domain (color, aesthetics, religion, etc.) And experimental studies keep finding, over and over again, that these claims are not true true 🧵


We showcased Castle Craft for the first time and had a lot of fun! Demo coming soon 🏰

Showcasing Castle Craft to the public at Hero Fest was both incredibly exciting and a tad intimidating! After three days at the booth, we left both happy and exhausted. A group of kids even came back three times to play again – that's how we know we're on the right track! 💓

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2


Jonathan Erhardt Reposted

Do language models know whether statements are true/false? And if so, what's the best way to "read an LLM's mind"? In a new paper with @tegmark, we explore how LLMs represent truth. 1/N


Admittedly biased, lots of philosophers are still defending the 70s-90s view 😄

Tweet Image 1

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.