@Curious80891460 Profile picture

Curious George

@Curious80891460

Always curious.

Similar User
Steve photo

@StevenR50661969

Alon Solomon אלון סולומון photo

@AlonSolomon5

Chamlies photo

@ChamliesCharles

Dieter !™️ photo

@Diiewam

SilverR photo

@ThelastSilverR

golddowratio1 #silversqueeze photo

@goldwatcher5000

FREEDOM 🇨🇦 ♤SILVER 🇨🇦 THETA photo

@CHIZZA45

Shares Doctor photo

@Shares_Doctor

ValueFounder photo

@neofoo23

ScrewJPM photo

@JpmScrew

David Joshua Lee photo

@Davidjlee881

Thomas Klimchuck photo

@T_Klimchuck

Greg Germon photo

@jackgermon

Lisa photo

@Lisa00007369

אדרל photo

@guy0682

Curious George Reposted

Being in Congress means you can enrich yourself in so many "legal" ways. For instance, the stock market!


Curious George Reposted

Some banger comments in the recent Grantham note: gmo.com/americas/resea… Quality: "U.S. quality stocks have a long history of slightly underperforming in bull markets and substantially outperforming in bear markets (although they did unusually well in the recent run-up). In…


Curious George Reposted

Great news! Literally nobody cares about gold anymore, so now it can moon 🥳

Tweet Image 1

Curious George Reposted

tweet of the day

I ask this with all sincerity: What is the game plan here?

Tweet Image 1


Curious George Reposted

Demand is a function of price. Consumption is just the amount consumed/purchased. They are related but not the same. To say that "demand is high" based on rising consumption may not be accurate. It may simply be that price is down.


Curious George Reposted

@LukeGromen Here is how the analog overlay of the current advancing phase for the gold price is looking versus its advancing phase in the 1970s. The timing of this ultimate cycle-high is expected between 2027-2028 which is supported by other analysis. (1/2)

Tweet Image 1

Interestingly, gold was $170 on this day in May 1975. A little over four years later it was $800.



Curious George Reposted

As we’ve repeatedly told you all, fewer than twenty people control the entire crypto market.

Aside from Radix, Jane Street and Tower Research were revealed as Binance’s biggest “VIP” traders. The CFTC complaint detailed that Radix was the largest flows contributor (12%). However, in conversations I’ve had, I’ve learned that Tower is actually the largest at 20%.



Curious George Reposted

For months I've been wondering about the disconnect between the red-hot labor market & icy-cold consumer sentiment. Why are Americans, particularly lower-income ones w/ the fastest wage growth, so pessimistic about their finances? What are we missing? 🧵 washingtonpost.com/opinions/inter…


Curious George Reposted

🏦📉 SVB Crash Explained📉🏦 Silicon Valley Bank—#16 largest US bank with $212B — just crashed 60% in 1 day & fell 22% post-close. Stock halted now. @BillAckman is calling a US gov bailout. @peterthiel is calling a bank run. JPM, BAC, WFC all dropped 6%. What's next? Is this…

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2

Curious George Reposted

"This is an ecosystem that is totally corrupt... I can't believe @cz_binance has a license to operate in the UAE," @Nouriel tells CNBC's @dan_murphy on stage at Abu Dhabi Finance Week.


Curious George Reposted

SHE IS THE CEO OF FTX / ALAMEDA WHERE WHERE THE SIGNS LMAO


Curious George Reposted

The figure above is showing (Fed debt) x 6%. Divide that by tax receipts and you get >50% as shown. Of the marketable Fed Gov debt ▪️ 58% is in Notes (2yr, 3yr, 5yr, 10yr) ▪️ 16% is in Bills (1y or less) ▪️ 16% is in Bonds (20yr, 30yr) ▪️ 8% is in TIPs

Tweet Image 1

Curious George Reposted

For context, in fiscal 2021: ▪️ $4.47 trillion in new Notes were issued (of those, $2.04t were to cover redemptions) ▪️ $0.72 trillion in new Bonds were issued (of those, $0.69t coved redemptions) So ~30% of the debt outstanding needs to be rolled over each year.


Curious George Reposted

A 6% rate will ultimately put the Federal Gov debt interest expense to greater than 50% of tax receipts. Add in a recession, expect tax receipts to fall by 20-30% so interest on debt becomes more like 65%+ of tax receipts. So how likely is 6% in terms of a sustainable rate?

Tweet Image 1

Curious George Reposted

Wow, Raskin just slamming Republicans


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.