@feenagirl399 Profile picture

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈

@feenagirl399

I am a 28 year old mostly closeted trans lesbian 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈AuDHD she/her free palestine🇵🇸

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

When MAGA calls them “woke generals” what they really means are generals whose first loyalty is to the United States Constitution. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

24. Lastly, I am an award-winning transgender journalist and columnist covering LGBTQ+ issues every day. You can subscribe to support my journalism at erininthemorning.com/subscribe.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

23. History has made it clear: there is no compromise with those who seek erasure. Concessions do not slow their agenda—they accelerate it. You cannot negotiate a middle ground with eradication, and pretending otherwise only fuels the fire.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

22. When reps like Seth Moulton and Tom Suozzi call for a "discussion," they should start by listening to the voices the constituents whose lives are on the line. Sacrificing them, their families, their allies for political expediency is not a winning strategy, it's betrayal.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

21. Many Democrats realize the folly of this. That's why Governor Andy Beshear in Kentucky, a R+30 state, called on Democrats to not throw LGBTQ+ people under the bus, that it wouldn't work, and to lead with your values.

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

11. Conceding to anti-trans sports bans has not shielded Democratics from further attacks. In Ohio, before the election was even over, they already moved beyond Sports when attacking Sherrod Brown, saying that he would "allow men in girls bathrooms" youtube.com/watch?v=N3-5sX…


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

10. That’s because accepting transgender bans in sports means accepting a Republican framework explicitly designed to justify further eradication efforts. If trans people are dangerous in a soccer field, why not a bathroom? Why even allow them to transition at all?


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

9. But by the end of 2023, it was clear: every state that passed a trans sports ban went on to enact some of the most draconian anti-trans laws in history, prohibiting drag, shutting down pride parades, bounties on trans people in bathrooms, denial of drivers license markers.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

8. For a time, this seemed to hold. Gender affirming care bans failed in states like Texas, and even Republican governors vetoed the bills.

Tweet Image 1

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

7. The strategy worked. By the end of 2022, 18 Republican controlled states had passed sports bans. In many of these states, "moderates" supported the sports bans while rejecting trans care bans, telling advocates that sports bans were "it," and there would be no further attacks.

Tweet Image 1

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

6. Terry Schilling, who ran the ad, in CNN interview made his intent clear: “The women’s sports issue was really the beginning point in helping expose all this because what it did was, it got opponents of the LGBT movement comfortable with talking about transgender issue,”


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

5. The first anti-trans ad, entitled "track," was targeting Andy Beshear in 2019. Beshear won, but the strategy remained... over the next two years, a dozen states passed anti-trans sports bans, setting the stage for what was to come. See that ad here: youtube.com/watch?v=gb870E…


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

4. How did we get here? I watched over years and reported as anti-LGBTQ+ campaigners used sports as a trojan horse to enact an agenda of eradication. In state after state, sports bans were the first domino laying the groundwork for horrors inflicted by Republican legislatures.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

3. If you had a time machine in 2019 and traveled to 2024, the shift over trans rights in the US would be shocking. In the 2019, trans people could openly access care in all states. Now... bounties in bathrooms, adults cut off from medical care, and drivers licenses pulled.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

2. In the wake of Harris loss in the 2024 election, a debate has emerged over trans participation in sports... on whether or not Democrats should abandon "the sports issue." This is deeply misguided. I explain why in my latest piece. erininthemorning.com/p/opinion-the-…


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

1. It was never about sports. Some have argued that Democrats should give up on trans people in sports. As a leading transgender journalist covering the issue for years, I can say that this is a strategy doomed to fail. Here's why. Subscribe to support my journalism.

Tweet Image 1

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

20. And just yesterday, Helen Joyce openly confirmed that sports bans are their way to get an end to all transgender legal recognition.

Tweet Image 1

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

19. The far right strategy knows this well. When I first mentioned the trans chess bans, Riley Gaines, the anti-trans swimmer who campaigned with many republicans, proudly proclaimed she worked to make it happen, showing it clearly wasn't about "advantages."

Tweet Image 1

feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

18. These are not the discussions Moulton wants to have. He's right that we can "win on these issues" if we talk about them. But that's not what he is advocating for. He's advocating for permission to abandon his transgender constituents entirely.


feena van🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Reposted

17. There are reasonable discussions to be had... what hormone therapy requirements should be for each sport, how to monitor them. That's not what sports bans do. They are blunt instruments, targeting 9 year olds in soccer, and disc golf, fishing, billiards, and even chess.

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2
Tweet Image 3
Tweet Image 4

United States Trends
Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.