@cjrichier Profile picture

Corey Richier

@cjrichier

Clinical psych PhD student at @UofIllinois. Psychopathology, comorbidity, machine learning, and systems/computational neuroscience. Opinions my own

Similar User
Q. Liu | 刘启民, Ph. D. photo

@QMmmmmmLiu

Katie Kemp, Ph.D. photo

@DrKathrynKemp

Sarah H. Sperry, PhD photo

@DrSarahSperry

Mood, Emotion, & Development Lab at Vanderbilt photo

@MEDVanderbilt

Nadja R. Ging Jehli photo

@NadjaGingJehli

Andrew Kiselica, PhD, ABPP photo

@AndrewK_PhD

Carly A. Lasagna photo

@Carly_Lasagna

Dustin Haraden @dustinharaden.com photo

@DustinHaraden

Vonetta Dotson photo

@VonettaDotson

Daniel P. Moriarity photo

@dp_moriarity

John O’Hara photo

@DrJohnOHara

Julianne Griffith, PhD photo

@JulianneGrif

Erin Kaseda 加世田エリン photo

@erinkaseda

Sheila A. M. Rauch, Ph.D. photo

@sheila_rauch

Carter Funkhouser photo

@CarterFunkhous1

Pinned

Thrilled to announce my first manuscript submission of graduate school was promptly rejected! 🥳


Corey Richier Reposted

My demons said I couldn’t do it, To go from never running a marathon to full Ironman in <6mo, w/ a newborn & building/launching bolt․new, But today after a 2.4mi swim, 112mi bike, full 26.2mi marathon, all back to back in 12h15m, I am an Ironman.


Corey Richier Reposted

PhD position available! Interested in thinking critically about determinants & definitions of mental health, long-term impacts of early-life experience, & fundamental mechanisms of decision-making? See aaron.bornstein.org/lab for details, and apply at apply.grad.uci.edu/apply/


Corey Richier Reposted

What happens when we break down DSM diagnoses into their individual symptoms and rebuild our classification system from the ground up? Do we see familiar DSM constructs, HiTOP dimensions, or something else entirely? New paper out today! ✨ journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21… 1/🧵

Tweet Image 1

How do your favorite disorders fare in a data-driven reorganization of the DSM-5? Find out in this new preprint where we followed the patterns in 14,762 individuals’ symptoms with the goal of overcoming limitations in both the DSM and @HiTOP_system x.com/PsyArXiv_bot_v…

Tweet Image 1


Corey Richier Reposted

Many of you know this, but some still don't get it. So here it is again: If your only acceptable outcome is statistical significance, you are doing rhetoric not science.


Corey Richier Reposted

(1/2) Join NIMH's Emotion and Development Branch as a Postbac IRTA! 🎓 Drs. Daniel Pine and Melissa Brotman are seeking recent grads to conduct research on the neurocognitive and decision-making mechanisms of mental illness with a focus on behavioral and mood disorders.


Corey Richier Reposted

So good the 1st time that I want to say again that @KwapilLab at @PsychIllinois is recruiting a doctoral student for fall 2025 - with an emphasis on conceptualization and assessment of multidimensional schizotypy. Application deadline is November 15th. psychology.illinois.edu/academics/phd-…


Corey Richier Reposted

"Averaging over time hides what a neuron actually sees, what it actually gets to compute with." 💯 We need a handy review paper on artifacts of averaging. I come across wildly incorrect inferences from averaging & other data summaries way too often. thetransmitter.org/neural-coding/…


Corey Richier Reposted

hands off! that’s the idea i planned to sit on for the next couple of decades


Corey Richier Reposted

This narrative review evaluates the validity of 9 diagnostic approaches in characterizing psychiatric symptoms. ja.ma/4d3Iy6o

Tweet Image 1

Corey Richier Reposted
Tweet Image 1

What do brain areas do?



Corey Richier Reposted

Don’t be deceived by pretty plots ❤️

The shared genetic effects of mental disorders.

Tweet Image 1


Corey Richier Reposted

There is one thing I keep hearing from NIH study sections, in paper reviews, or as questions at seminars: deep learning is not intrepretable and this makes DL problematic for medical imaging. This is flawed and here's something to read about this: ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/docum…


Corey Richier Reposted

New paper, listing 43 ways ML evaluations can be misleading or actively deceptive. Following the good critics of psychological science we call these "questionable research practices" (QRPs). (The working title was "How To Lie In Machine Learning")

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2

Corey Richier Reposted
Tweet Image 1

Corey Richier Reposted

*sung like @lucydacus* 🎶always a student never a doc🎶


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.