@No83935126 Profile picture

No

@No83935126

Joined May 2021
Similar User
New York Guy photo

@NewYorkGuy6

Josh Clark photo

@OKJosh56

circumcision victim photo

@circvictim

Curse of the Restoring Foreskin photo

@HorrorRestorer

Intacticorn photo

@intacticorn

Enjoyer of Men 🏳️‍🌈 (Free 🇵🇸!) photo

@the_man_enjoyer

Ringo HumaniStarr || ℙ𝕖𝕒𝕔𝕖 & 𝕃𝕠𝕧𝕖 ✌️☮️♥️ photo

@Ringo_Humanista

Modernist Perspective 🏳️‍🌈 photo

@Modernist2020

Pissed Off Wisconsinite photo

@PissedOffWI

Circumcision Hypocrite. photo

@ItIsMutilation

INTACTED photo

@tt2039

Liliane photo

@lili2be

David Candela photo

@MenteEnferma17

Jon Mur photo

@JonMur5

K Kev photo

@K_Kev_

Pedophilia in plain sight 🤢

circumcision insanity



It will always be weird that the normal anatomy of mens genitals is labeled “uncut”. It’s all about the normalization of genital mutilation. We do not label women’s genitals as “uncut” because we’re not conditioned to believe it is abnormal for a woman to have whole genitalia.


No Reposted

I'd say the scar where my foreskin used to be is a sign of what happened to me. Stop gaslighting survivors of sexual abuse.


No Reposted

This is extremely predatory. They’re luring kids in with Minecraft (not sure if officially licensed or not) so parents sign off to have them cut up permanently/irreversibly. A kid should not have healthy parts of their genitals amputated. #circumcision #HumanRightsViolations

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2
Tweet Image 3

No Reposted

Except that none of those people can attest to how they would feel had they not been cut. Can they? They have never felt the difference in sensation, because they can't. So their opinion is literally uninformed.


No Reposted

Here you have the religious one:

Tweet Image 1

No Reposted

Facts don't care about your feelings. Intact implies whole, not missing any parts, the word is well defined. Take offense if you will; however no, people who are missing their foreskin do not have intact genitals.

This post is unavailable.

No Reposted

The two women I once knew that did it to their sons couldn’t give me any more of an answer than “it’s just what you do”. FCKING DUMB. I do NOT understand this Trend at all. It’s Barbaric and Baseless!


No Reposted

It's done to babies behind closed doors. Why? Cause it isn't about health. It's about conformity. Try telling an experienced 18-25 (consent age to end of parental health plan coverage) year old circumcision is good for their health. Numbers would drop like whale shit in ocean.


No Reposted

Mine are 16 and 17 and still intact. They would probably be at the crud out of me if I suggested such a thing 🤣

Be honest, you circumcise your baby because they can’t say no. Try telling your 15 year old son he’s going to get circumcised because you think it’s better. He’d probably get a judge to side with him to not be forced to do it. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.



No Reposted

Be honest, you circumcise your baby because they can’t say no. Try telling your 15 year old son he’s going to get circumcised because you think it’s better. He’d probably get a judge to side with him to not be forced to do it. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.


It is crazy that people still believe the foreskin is vestigial… I guess that’s what happens when you mutilate a large portion of men as infants, they have no experience/knowledge of natural male anatomy.

This post is unavailable.

No Reposted

Uses religion as a justification ✅ Slanders males as inherently disgusting & unhygienic as justification ✅ Trivializes the ethics and belittles the damage done by circumcision ✅ I really wish you guys were more original. Can yall plz come up with something better?


No Reposted

Even the numbers are problematic, verging on deceptive/ misleading.

Tweet Image 1

No Reposted

Circumcision is the biggest fraud in the medical system today. All of the purported benefits are nonsense and easy to debunk. The harms are ignored, denied, and ridiculed. Bad instructions of intact care (forced retraction) are what actually cause infections, scars, & bleeding.


No Reposted

😵‍💫 10+ years I’ve been working on this & the general public still can’t seem to get the basic point: *non-voluntary/forced* genital cutting is fundamentally morally different than *voluntary/chosen* genital cutting (or urgently necessary surgery in a medical emergency) 🚨🚨🚨🚨

Suggesting that an infant who cannot yet vocalize any preference about their body or the risk they are willing to have targeted on their genitals should not have a medically unnecessary surgery performed on their sexual anatomy without their consent is not anti-trans rhetoric



No Reposted

The doctor forces a tool into the tiny opening to widen it. This rips the membrane that attaches the inner foreskin to the glans, his screaming becomes shrill and heart wrenching. What we’re doing to our newborn boys is nothing short of barbaric.


No Reposted

Well it’s a a child so that is irrelevant. Why would I slice my son for my own sexual preference in an adult? That’s creepy and disgusting.


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.