@Invisibleman817 Profile picture

S.I.

@Invisibleman817

An “unknown entity”. What he said 👆🏻

Joined March 2021
Similar User
J M Nihoff photo

@NihoffJM

Mr. Mitchell photo

@John_mitch77

Joe Hill photo

@JoeHill80

MAGA Vet 🇺🇸🦅🪖 photo

@ScottWe01768722

libertarian engr photo

@liberty_engr

Mirage photo

@Mirage_AKD

Preet photo

@PreetDhimanzz

Libs Are Looney photo

@NickMonRocks

Mike D photo

@aldomontoyia

Just G photo

@Just_GLM

John photo

@sheets_sheets

kiss you photo

@kissyou83836243

bob photo

@bobtylxr

S.I. Reposted

Why the Democrats lost the election.


S.I. Reposted

How To Answer This Transgender Emotional Blackmail Tactic 🧵

Tweet Image 1

It’s extremists like this ass clown who hate women with a passion. Denying trans women are women is not denying care to them. Truth is never a harm to anyone. You’re just irrational and unhinged.

I second this. Boycott the Harry Potter series if you have any shred of care for the trans community



S.I. Reposted

Biological men do not belong in private women’s spaces. Period. Full stop. End of story.

Tweet Image 1
Tweet Image 2

S.I. Reposted

I respect @abbydphillip but it’s not “transphobic” to state reality. A boy can’t magically become a girl through pronouns, drugs, or surgery—no matter how much @jaymichaelson says otherwise. @MrShermichael was right. Testosterone is not a social construct.


It’s called lying about who she truly was. She was a chameleon. She is at heart and mind Woke AF. Anyone not understanding that is unserious.

I grate against the brain-rotting forces of wokeness as much as the next fella, but Harris did not run a woke campaign. She moved right on many issues, most notably immigration, and—to her credit—didn’t do much annoying identity stuff. Anyone blaming her “wokeness” is unserious.



Because the militant leftwing feminist and trans ideologues don’t want to impose anything themselves. Absolutely nothing. Yeah, ok.

TheoBros, TechBros, & Trump , by @kkdumez open.substack.com/pub/kristindum… The very men preaching a militant patriarchy inside evangelical churches have set their sights on seizing power in order to impose their understanding of “God’s law” on the rest of us. They’re not shy about…



What a pathetically childish comment. No one is opposed to trans ideology as I am but that shouldn’t mean we demean ourselves by celebrating this.

HAHAHAH !!! GOOD !! 🤣🤣🤣



There it is. The X word. Can’t leave it out. Nothing says I’ll paint the other side as monsters than with this emotional accusation. This is article is just a NeverTrump screed.


Politically emasculated non conservatives like this doofus ass clown are the reason why the GOP is where it’s at. Hey dummy, do something else with your life.

Republicans have seen what happens when Trump loses (he tries to steal the election) and they've seen the down-ballot candidates he elevates (they're almost uniformly losers) and they decided "eh we'll go with him again." Why would it be different in 2028? politico.com/news/magazine/…



Then it’s a good thing I don’t give a dam what you find yucky.

I think it’s yucky to publicly backstab family members.



Neither should anyone else.

I think it’s yucky to publicly backstab family members.



S.I. Reposted

America is the greatest country in the world. Capitalism is the greatest economical system in the world. Encouraging strong family values only helps build safer and stronger communities. A leader who’s feared & respected by the enemy, will prevent unnecessary wars. Peace…


Pure nonsense. There is plenty of public art today. Churches themselves were either stripped by the State of their art or stripped themselves. The greatest works of art are <not>locked in mansions. This makes for great theatrics and hysteria.

For example, the upper class once funded beautiful paintings for display in public churches The lower class had access to high art Now, art stays locked away in upper-class mansions That is a sin against the common good

Tweet Image 1


This is the solid foundation for class envy and conflict. What does the bourgeoisie owe the proletariat? The only difference between you and the Marxist is they are much more consistent with in working out the implications of your premises.

"There should be no classes! We should all be equal." Good luck. Human beings will always form classes Instead of wishing that weren't true, ask: What does the upper class owe the lower class



But on your conception of the Common Good it’s no less then State redistribution of our wealth because according to you the State has a bird’s eye(God like?) and hence best view of society and can direct it best.

"So we should just give all our money to the government?" No. The common good is more than material goods. It includes spiritual goods like peace, justice, morality, etc. Those can't be achieved by simple taxation and redistribution



Even if one grants that the State can “see the whole of society” it most certainly does not follow that it can direct it. The distribution and allocation of scarce resources by the State leads to mismanagement by bureaucrats.

3) Governments exist to promote the common good A ruler can see the whole society and direct it So, he has a chief responsibility to promote the common good That is one reason why Jesus said to "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's"

Tweet Image 1


We have all sorts of moral responsibilities but where does the State come in to force us to use our wealth to fulfill them. What is the limiting factor for the State?

In the parable of the talents, the master expected more from the servant who had more money If God gives you property, you have a responsibility to use it well More Property = More Responsibility to the common good

Tweet Image 1


Ok, so yes we do have a moral responsibility for sure but what if one chooses not to use it their wealth that way? The State then redistributes it for them?

"But I have a right to my private property!" Yes, but you also have responsibility. You are not your own. (1 Cor 6:19) All of your property, even your body, comes from God.



Nope, it’s quite simple. Only two ever observable sexes in nature. Complications can occur in sex development for sure but this is not a confusion of the binary nature of sex.

That omits phenotypic sexes, like androgen insensitivity syndrome. Sex is, in fact, pretty darn complicated.



Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.