Similar User
Kevin Mak photo

@KevinLMak

SpacRight photo

@SpacRight

Aaron Kelly's Bones photo

@AaronKellyBones

RLH Capital photo

@valwithcatalyst

NomadBets photo

@NomadBets

Osk🅰️r Mirek photo

@oskar_mirek

M.C. Escher (Specul🅰️tor) photo

@808emanresu

Igor Schatz photo

@Copernicus2013

Sp🅰️ceMobM🅰️m🅰️ photo

@ASTSstarchild

Ed Knapp photo

@edknapp

J photo

@Alt

Asymmetric photo

@asymmetric_bets

K🅰️Jazmin photo

@KarelidaJazmin

Armando Librino 🅰️ photo

@ArmandoLibrino

Alpha XY photo

@BrokerBrody

$ASTS if the GME folks come over than this stock could really take off. Hate to sell at $3.50 and wake up with the stock at $35.00


$ASTS Nice!


$ASTS Still hoping someone would translate what this means: licensing.fcc.gov/ibfsweb/ib.pag…


IdenixHunter Reposted

You really do seem to be scared of $ASTS. You are almost fanatical about your opposition. It is a little weird don't you think?


IdenixHunter Reposted

You really do seem to be scared of $ASTS. You are almost fanatical about your opposition. It is a little weird don't you think?


$ASTS There is still money available from FN. There will be more investment from AT&T and Vodafone. Intelisat CEO is on record saying that an Investment is coming (for a SCS company with many MNO relationships) What about the Rural5G fund?


$ASTS If AT&T and Vodafone know in advance that they will fund the build-out, then they each should aggressively build a 20% position. If funding will not be a problem then 20% at these prices would be a gift.


$ASTS I actually like the ad. Clever!


$ASTS This video does seem strange. Why now? its still a ways off.


$ASTS At&T just needs to start buying a few million share at the market and the stock will shoot up.


$ASTS Why doesn't the phone say "Ben"?


IdenixHunter Reposted

Nobody is privy to the conversations that have been happening with the FirstNet Authority. With 5.5 million users and a great product/market fit that is a very substantial cash flow. $5-10/month to add coverage could be almost $30M /month to $ASTS.


$ASTS The reason the FCC did not accept for filing the SCS or operation between 617 MHz and 2200.0 MHz yet is probably because the R&O Rules are still on Public Notice and haven't been finalized yet.


IdenixHunter Reposted

He is an expert at this stuff so he was intentionally not revealing what he probably knew just by reading the Public Notice


IdenixHunter Reposted

It also means that @FREESPEECH1017 was wrong


IdenixHunter Reposted

$ASTS Launch 248 Sats: Granted Feeder Links 37.5-42.0 GHz; 47.2-50.2 GHz; 50.4-51.4 GHz: Granted TT&C 430-440 MHz;2025-2110 MHz;2200-2290 MHz: Granted But no SCS or operation between 617 MHz and 2200.0 MHz yet.


IdenixHunter Reposted

$ASTS All this BS about no "Direct Insertion" from @FREESPEECH1017 . He knew better.


IdenixHunter Reposted

$ASTS "AST requests to deploy and operate a constellation of 248 satellites" They can do TT&C and Feeder link operations but No SCS or Operation between 617 MHz and 2200.0 MHz That means that they can start deploying their Sats!!


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.