@saulhoward Profile picture

saul

@saulhoward

founder @getdeepdrama

Joined July 2007
Similar User
Gil Dibner 🇮🇱 photo

@gdibner

Simon Jacques photo

@JacqusieOT

11:11🖤 photo

@keylvxu

Isabela Granic photo

@PlayNiceInst

mark photo

@lofideepfried

Cambrian Centre photo

@cambrian_centre

Levi Scott photo

@levithetweetguy

Niharica photo

@newharica

Constantijn Schepens photo

@BarefootTijn

Neal Jones photo

@qazuqazu

Nick McGrath photo

@titbit

Josh Holloway photo

@imjoshholloway

jj32_⚡️ photo

@jennibryant24

Matty Rothman photo

@MattRothman3

Boyan Dimitrov photo

@nathariel

huge if true

saulhoward's tweet image. huge if true

saul Reposted

The market wants the UK to be a leader in AI. The planning system is doing its best to prevent that happening.

Data centre refused planning permission in Iver, Buckinghamshire building.co.uk/news/gove-refu… Data centre refused planning permission in Abbots Langley, Hertfordshire itpro.com/infrastructure… Now NIMBYs want to block a data centre in Havering



Annoyed everyday that the only models available are tuned to corporate-speak. So many of the cool use-cases need more. How are you going to write a Hollywood screenplay if you can't generate evil.

fuck AI safety. Who's working on AI danger?



Apple commoditised consumer AI. With privacy, data guarantees, UX on the iPhone, it'll be near-impossible to compete (and Android will copy). Good news is this will be a BYOD-type moment for enterprise UI - people are going to demand the same tools at work.


saul Reposted

How artificial intelligence will actually work...

markburgess_osl's tweet image. How artificial intelligence will actually work...

saul Reposted

""Be not the first by whom the new is tried, Nor yet the last to cast the old aside". — Tech advice from Alexander Pope! disq.us/p/2yyd9qt


John Calvin, c1536:

I fucking love working



The lesson from xz wasn't that OSS is uniquely vulnerable, it was a reminder that many closed source systems have been similarly owned, and we'll never find out.

Literally, people who work in national security disagree with the premise that closed source is superior.



Because the name isn't what the variable is. The code tells you what it is. Variables aren't an abstraction - functions are, and they can have explanatory names.

Why do C programmers always obfuscate their code? Are they trying to save space? Do they have to pay for each letter? Are they using some trial version of GCC that doesn't allow actual words in variable names?

norpadon's tweet image. Why do C programmers always obfuscate their code? Are they trying to save space? Do they have to pay for each letter? Are they using some trial version of GCC that doesn't allow actual words in variable names?


Consumer companies today construct a fantasy world of their products for customers to live in. Real world AI agents need to get messy. Even if they could build it, a company can't assume that risk.


If we accept OAI's reframing of AGI as "very capable agent", I still don't see that any of the giants are capable of building this. It will require extreme real-world taste in design. Apple level, but Apple don't interface with the real-world.


Delaware was the first network state, but no one bothered to check.

has anyone actually been to delaware?



AI is going to be OSS. Corporates aren't going to provide the models the people want. AI is local compute, and cloud-lock-in is the primary way they centralise tech.


Cameron's projects always sound insane, then he spends all the money, then he makes it all back. If I was his investor I wouldn't even want to hear the pitch.

The opening sequence to ‘Terminator 2’ cost more than the entire first film 💰



Working for the money in Rome beats governing a far-flung province.

Word on the Tech Street is he’s going into VC.

mikebutcher's tweet image. Word on the Tech Street is he’s going into VC.


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.