@_SciOR Profile picture

ScienceOpenReviewed

@_SciOR

Science Open Reviewed is a new online community of researchers promoting efficient and accountable open peer review in science.

Joined July 2013
Similar User
Open Access India photo

@OAIndia

Richard Poynder photo

@RickyPo

Birgit Schmidt photo

@bschmid1

Iryna Kuchma photo

@irynakuchma

ScienceOpen Research photo

@SO_Research

CyanBlueSeas photo

@cyanblueseas

Peter Kraker @PeterKraker@scicomm.xyz photo

@PeterKraker

John Hammersley photo

@DrHammersley

RatSWD photo

@ratswd

Laurian Williamson photo

@LaurianW

The worst piece of peer review I’ve ever received timeshighereducation.co.uk/features/the-w… via @timeshighered


Removing the Journal Impact Factor from Faculty Evaluation blogs.lt.vt.edu/openvt/2015/01… via @openatvt


ScienceOpenReviewed Reposted

Love this, a kind of peer review 'oath' - should be standard! economist.com/news/science-a… http://t.co/RyUSMIEsVh

Tweet Image 1

Open peer review is a welcome step towards transparency. bit.ly/HJklEx


Why are university researchers still using commercial publishers? musingsone.com/2014/08/why-ar… #COASP


Why are university researchers still using commercial publishers? musingsone.com #SciComm #academia #peerreview #COASPA


ScienceOpenReviewed Reposted

#HEFCEmetrics RT @ernestopriego: @HEFCE wants your feedback on metrics for research assessment. My personal thoughts epriego.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/on-…


ScienceOpenReviewed Reposted

In 2009, Elsevier went to court to keep its subscription prices confidential. Now, we know why. Look at the spread: http://t.co/OCZTQnyPWk

Tweet Image 1

Traditional journal editors are usually forced to settle for whoever is willing to volunteer a gratuitous peer review. Try @_SciOR #G2B2014


@_SciOR is free because it is not operated by a profit-driven enterprise, or a traditional paywall-based journal #G2B2014


Traditionally no one except the editor has knowledge of a reviewer’s credibility or track record of peer review quality. Try@_SciOR #G2B2014


Authors and reviewers connect and work together @_SciOR to improve a paper—with worthwhile rewards for both #G2B2014


Tired of addiction to chasing impact factor? Science is not a mission for elitism — but a mission for discovery. Try @_SciOR #G2B2014


Blind reviewing gives power over others, to approve papers that support one’s own research & reject those that conflict Try @_SciOR #G2B2014


Editors usually find reviewers after several others, more preferred & better qualified, have declined. Try a better way @_SciOR #G2B2014


Tired of biased poor-quality reviews from reviewers hiding behind anonymity & selected secretly by editors? Try @_SciOr #G2B2014


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.